Q3.6 - What is the rationale for using 66% of the official fiscal value, rather than an independent market valuation, as the reference for collateral coverage? - FAQ
Navigation
Accueil FAQ Project Overview 4 Land Ownership and Legal Status 4 Guarantees and Collateral 10 Cross-Border Enforceability 2 Independent Valuation 2 Construction Guarantees and Risk Management 3 Use of Funds and Escrow Account 5 Positioning in the Capital Structure 2 Revenue, Returns, and Exit Options 7 Governance, Reporting, and Transparency 8 Default and Recovery Process 3 Advanced Follow-Up Questions 6 Taxation and Currency 2 Taxation and Currency 2
Export
PDF Excel
Q3.6

What is the rationale for using 66% of the official fiscal value, rather than an independent market valuation, as the reference for collateral coverage?

Guarantees and Collateral 31/12/2025
The use of 66% of the official fiscal value is intended as a conservative and transparent metric based on a public, auditable reference (National Registry). Official fiscal values tend to lag market prices and are generally below recent transaction levels, so applying a 34% haircut to this already conservative baseline results in a prudent collateral coverage ratio. Independent third‑party appraisals may be commissioned to provide an additional market‑based view, but our intention is not to rely solely on potentially more volatile market valuations for minimum coverage tests.
Autres questions dans "Guarantees and Collateral"
Q3.1

Which Costa Rican real estate assets will be pledged as collateral for the Luxembourg bonds?
Q3.2

How will these parcels be valued for collateral purposes?
Q3.3

Is a first-ranking mortgage on the land feasible and legally enforceable?
Q3.4

Are there any other debts or encumbrances that could dilute investor protection?
Q3.5

What is the exact contractual and ownership relationship between the Luxembourg issuer and the Costa Rican entities holding the land?
Q3.6 Actuelle

What is the rationale for using 66% of the official fiscal value, rather than an independent market valuation, as the reference for collateral coverage?
Q3.7

Who will be the legal holder of the first-ranking mortgage in Costa Rica (bondholders directly, a security agent, or a trustee)?
Q3.8

What are the estimated enforcement and recovery costs, and how would they be funded?
Q3.9

Upon enforcement, would bondholders become direct owners of the land, or would ownership pass through a local SPV or fiduciary structure?
Q3.10

Could you provide a detailed list of the parcels pledged as collateral at closing, including cadastral references, surface, zoning, and individual fiscal values?
Retour à la FAQ
Rechercher une autre question